rmy Reserve/USACC Trainin
& Training Support Summit
Purpose
Review all Reserve training & training
support provided to USACC, identify
perennial requirements , coordinate an
alternative direct commissioning
partnership, and lay out COAs & due-
outs for the way ahead.
Concept
Philosophy:
• This is a working conference that must
result in deliverables
Three Working
Groups:
l.
Deliverables supporting FY05:
• LDAC & LTC Requirements
• JROTC Requirements
• Ranger Challenge, Bde-level FTXs,&
Reserve CTLT Opportunities
• Update alternative staffing initiative via
the 8th SROTC Bdes and DIV(IT)
community 3
• USACC Support for the Reserve's ARG2G
Direct Comm Initiative
• Post deliverables on-line listing perennial
training support requirements, Reserve 8th
SROTC Bde status of support & alternative
commissioning partnership & support
SROTC Bde alternative
staffing update and
Reserve Partnership Way
Ahead between the
DIV(IT)s and USACC
Training & Training
Support for
LDAC/LTC/J ROTC, Ranger
Challenge, CTLT and Bde-
level FTXs
Army Reserve Green-to-
Gold (ARG2G) Direct-
Commissioning Program
Way Ahead
■
Attendees
US ACC
OCAR
• ACOS-R: COL Harrell * PA&E: Mr. Rost
• DOLD: LTC Jimerson, MAJ Trexler, Ms. # RM: LTC Dorney
Visconti
• RM: Ms. Imgrund
• Futures: LTC Miller, Mr. Kennedy
US. Army Reserve
Command
• G-l: COL Earley, MAJ Hersey
• G-7: Mr. Hargraves, MAJ Mosley, MSG Kolasienski
• G-8: Ms. Mesko
DIV(IT)/SROTC Bde Community Development: COL Oskam
84TH ARRTC: COL Rego, COL Soderberg, MSG Schuh
80TH DIV(IT):COL Clark, COL Faison, CSM White, MAJ Peterson,
95th DIV(IT): LTC LeCompte,
98th DIV(IT): LTC McClellan,
100TH DIV(IT): COL Argabright, LTC Shain
104th DIV(IT): LTC Lee,
108th DIV(IT): COL Dyer, Mr. Miller (Tng Off)
Agenda 6-7-8 July
6 June 2004
1300-1315: COL Harrell, Welcome & Opening
Remarks
1315-1330: Attendee Introductions
1330-1700: Information Briefs (10-15 min. ea)
- DOLD Support Overview: LTC Jimerson
- Reserve G-7 Spt Overview: MAJ Mosley
108th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: COL Dyer
- 104 th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: LTC Lee
- 100th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: COL
Argabright
- 98th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: LTC McClellan
95th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: LTC LeCompte
80th DIVIT/SROTC Bde: COL Blane, COL
Faison
- 84th ARRTC Concept: COL Rego
- ARG2G Review: COL Harrell
- USACC Reserve Way Ahead: Mr.
Kennedy
1700-1730: Review working group objectives &
due outs for the following day (COL Harrell)
7 June 2004
0800-0815: Working Group Orientation (COL
Harrell)
0815-1130: Working Groups in Session:
1. Training & Training Support for LDAC, LTC,
JROTC & CTLT. Lead: LTC Martin
2. Alt. Staffing & Reserve Partnership Way
Ahead Lead: LTC Miller
3. ARG2G Way Ahead. Lead: MAJ Mosley
1130-1200: Working Lunch (catered in place)
1130-1145: Working Group #1 IPR
1145-1300: Working Group #2 IPR
1300-1315: Working Group #3 IPR
1315-1600: Working Groups in session; refine due-
outs
1600-1730: Brief IPR to MG Thrasher, CG, USACC
8 June 2004
0800-1130: Working Groups finalize due-outs
1130-1200: Working Lunch (catered in place)
1130-1315: IPRs
1300-1500: Outbrief DCG, USACC, BG Sealock
1500-1530: Conference closing remarks
Reserve C2 Distribution Compared
to ROTC Bdes, AGR-R PMSs & DIV(IT)s
Each symbol is hyperlinked to the organization's web site when in slides
65TH RRC
FT. BUG HUNAN. PH
am
70TH RRC
FT. LAWTON, WA
6 3RD RRC
LOS ALAMITOS. CA
941 H RRC
FT. DEYENS RFTA. MA
77TH RRC
FT. TOTTEN, NY
99TH RRC
G0R0PQJ3, PA
&
*!►
a 9TH RRC
Z\ ROTCBde FT SHATTER. HI
O AGR-R PMS
(“) Major Reserve HQs
90TH me
LITTLE ROCK, AR
£ Reserve DIV(IT)
USAR C2 Dispersion
Ft Douglas UT c .
96th RSC Ft S ^" ma
Ft Harrison
IN
88th RSG
Heidelberg,
GER
7th A^OM
Ft Lawton WAr
70th RSCH
Ft Shatter HI
9th RSC
Los Alamitos
CA
63rd RSC
evens RFTA MA
94th RSC
Wichita KS
89th RSC
San Antonio TXN?llittl& Rock
90th RSG AR Birmingham
90th RSC D , At
81st RSC
Ft Buchanan, PR
65th RSC
■I
Working Group #1
Alt. Staffing & Reserve
Partnership Way Ahead
Mission Statement
Support Active Component ROTC
Battalions in the Total Army School
System (TASS) with their mission to
educate, train and inspire men and
women to become commissioned
officers in the U.S Army, U.S Army
National Guard and U.S Army
Reserve.
14 US ACC ROTC Brigad
USAR DIV (IT) Area of Operations -
FY 04
104TH DIV (IT)
VANCOUVER, WA
^ k REGION G
84TH DIV (IT)
MILWAUKEE, WI
REGION E
98TH DIV (IT)
ROCHESTER, NY
REGION A
95TH DIV (IT)
OKLAHOMA CITY,J)K
REGION F jVS
^lOOTH DIV (IT)
LOUISVILLE, KY
REGION D
OTH DIV (IT)
CHMOND, VA
REGION B
108TH DIV (IT)
CHARLOTTE, NC
REGION C
Tasks
Classroom Military Science I - IV Instruction
Recruiting Cadet/SMP
Nurse Recruiter
Scholarship Boards
FTX
Rifle Marksmanship
Ranger Challenge
Drill Teams/Color Guards
Physical Training
Combat Life Saver
Mentoring
Newsletter
What Reservists Offer
■ Experience - Average of ten years or more of AD/RC
■ Continuity - Reside in the area on permanent basis
■ Flexibility - Support the program during weekdays,
weekend, and summer training
■ Professionalism - Career soldiers
■ Enthusiasm - Dedication to program
■ Recruiting - Identify qualified Reserve soldiers
■ Marketing - Promote the Reserve
Components/Citizen Soldier to new cadets
80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
™ Brigade
2 nd , 3 rd & 4 th ROTC Brigade
Commander
COL Larry Faison
■
Command Sergeant Major
CSM Jim White
80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
™ Brigade
2 nd f 3 rd & 4 th ROTC Brigade
. gTH/soth Brigade
SROTC: Richmond, VA.
Supports Cadet
Command ROTC
Detachments with 51
TPU soldiers throughout
the 3 rd & 4 th ROTC
Brigades.
United States Army
Cadet Command Headquarters
To commission the future officer
leadership of the US Army and motivate
young people to be better citizens
University
Officers Enlisted
Assigned
Assigned
Hampton University
1
5
Widener University
3
3
Old Dominion University
4
3
University of Richmond
1
0
Norfolk State University
0
1
William & Mary University
0
1
George Mason University
4
1
U. of MD (College Park)
2
0
Bowie State
1
1
J ames Madison University
5
5
Georgetown University
3
1
University of Virginia
3
0
Loyola University
1
0
University of Delaware
1
0
University of Pittsburgh
1
0
Total
30
21
m
80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
Brigade
& 4 th ROTC Brigade
[TfADERShId]
jXCELLENCfl
Kingstor
« Ptpughkeep:
Ashtabula
oledo
O Central Hub
O Mountain Hub
O Northeast Hub
O Southeast Hub
O Satellite
late College
iswick
Atlantic dW
^Athens.
rleston
iricksburg
•^ynchburcj
tersburj
Jackj/fotintam
.Virginia Beach
I'D -itiagliar^All rights r^ser'
Elizabeth City
r /.\ f pbij si!-; ni hiip^riiiips.e^ps'Jii.oorn.
pH c Q ; Kmn
...
■L.Z-k:
Fairmo ,
^fersb^_^,C
Martinsbur
WES T-'-Jv
/■ R fi'lf N 1
Winchester^
i a/ / Jff
— 1 i
jf l
l-I.
yS
A v
\ i
f )
.
ri^jjf
aderpjiia
80 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
™ Brigade
2" d , 3 rd & ROTC Brigade
Remarks
■
^g?th DIV(IT), 8th SROTC Brigade
7 th f gth f iQth & nth ROTC Brigade
Commander
COL William Soderberg
Command Sergeant Major
CSM Edward Evans
o4 tn PIV(IT), o tn 5ROTC
Brigade
7 th , 9 th , 10 th & 11 th ROTC
B
.gth/ 84 th Brigade
SROTC:
Milwaukee, Wl.
Supports Cadet
Command ROTC
Detachments with 88
TPU soldiers throughout
the 7 th & 9 th ROTC
Brigade.
United States Army
Cadet Command Headquarters
To commission the future officer
leadership of the US Army and motivate
young people to be better citizens
University
Officers Enlisted
Assigned
Assigned
Brigade Staff
5
8
Marquette University
7
4
UW-Oshkosh
6
6
Kent State
4
2
Capital University
9
3
Central Mchigan University
0
3
Ul-Chicago
3
0
UW-Madison
2
1
E. MU-Yspilanti
1
2
UM-Ann Arbor
4
2
Western Michigan University
4
1
Notie Dame University
2
1
Indiana State
1
0
Central State University
1
0
Mchigan State
2
0
Mankato State
1
0
S. Indiana University
0
3
Total:
52
36
■
04 UI UIV(I I J, O'
Brigade
7 th , 9 th , 10 th & ll th ROTC
uw- Oshko® /v Dlfig^^ reenbay
t Norberts Colle
Ripon College
University of Illinois
Chicago State
Otterbein College
Notre Dame
W- Madison
84TH DIV (IT)
MILWAUKEE, WI
W 7 Milwaukee ^ region e
rquette University
ichigan - Ann Arbor
stern Michigan
niversity of Michigan
Rose Hulman
-Ferris State
- — -Youngstown State
Denison University
pitol University
nt State
Mount Union College
Southern Indiana
m
04 UI LIIV|I I ), O l " 5KU I L
Brigade
7 th , 9 th , 10 th & ll th ROTC
Brigade
Remarks
• Effective 1 Oct 04, 84th Division (IT)
reorganizes to become the 84th Reserve
Training Command at Ft. McCoy, Wl
• Subordinate brigades will be merged
with the 100th Division over the course
of FY05
• 8/100 will be the new SROTC HQ, taking
control overTPU instructor personnel in
IN, IL, KY, MN, Ml, OH, TN, Wl
m
3 95*1 DIV(IT), 8th SROTC Brigade
10th,llth & 12th ROTC Brigades
Commander
LTC Randy LeCompte
■
Command Sergeant Major
CSM Paul Hill
th DIV(IT) f 8 th SROTC Brigad
10 th , 11 th & 12 th ROTC Brigades
. gth/95th Brigade
SROTC: Stillwater, OK.
Supports Cadet
Command ROTC
Detachments with 41
TPU soldiers throughout
the 10 th , 11 th & 12 th
ROTC Brigades.
United States Army
Cadet Command Headquarters
University
Officers Enlisted
Assigned
Assigned
UTA/SMU/UNT
5
2
WASH/LINDEN WOOD
6
2
Creighton
2
0
Texas A&M Kingsville
0
1
Univ of Houston/TX Southern
1
0
UT-S A/Palo Alto
2
0
KU/Washbum
0
1
Central AK
2
1
HSU/OBU
1
0
TCU
4
0
Tarleton
1
0
Dubuque
1
0
UCO/Langston/Rose State
2
1
MWSC
4
2
Total:
31
10
To commission the future officer
leadership of the US Army and motivate
young people to be better citizens
m
5 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Briga
10 th , 11 th & 12 th ROTC Brigades
☆
()
o
Washburn Univ. (U of KS)
Rose State College
(UCO)
Langsto n Univ . /So Naz
Univ. North Texas (
Arlington)
SMU
(TCU)
Tarleton St.
95TH DIV (IT)
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
REGION F
!xcellenc£ )
UN Nebraska^ Omaha
(Creighton
University)
UNI-Dubugue
UMKC (MoWSC)
NW Missouri
tl&ndenwood
Univ.
'1
UA-Little Rock
Henderson
State/ Ouachita
Baptist
BDE HQ's
Host School
Augmentation /
Partnership^ Non-TDA
School
them (U of
o Alt<H6g£ta£H) (UT-San
"Antonio)
Texas A&M - Corpus
Christi
(TX A&M Kingsville/Del
Mar)
m
G&5 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Briga
10 th f ll th & 12 th ROTC Brigades
Remarks
2 AC replacement missions:
- University of Central Oklahoma
- University of Central Arkansas
2 OIF selective mobilizations
2 Soldiers currently alerted for
mobilization
• |>8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde
I st & 2 nd ROTC Brigades
Commander
COL Mark Ricketts
CSM
CSM Herbert Whaley
Presenter: LTC Ken McClellan
8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde
st & 2nd roTC Brigades
. 8 TH/ 98 th Brigade
SROTC: West Hartford,
CT. Supports Cadet
Command ROTC
Detachments with 71
TPU soldiers throughout
the 1st ROTC brigade.
United States Army
Cadet Command Headquarters
To commission the future officer
leadership of the US Army and motivate
young people to be better citizens
University
Officers Enlisted
Assigned
Assigned
Boston University
1
0
Canisius College
8
4
Clarkson College
1
0
Fordham University
6
1
Hofstia University
9
3
Niagara University
3
4
Northeastern University
6
2
St Bonaventuie University
0
1
Syracuse University
5
1
University of Connecticut
3
1
University of Maine
2
0
University of Massachusetts
1
0
University of Vermont
2
0
Cornell University
3
0
Siena University
4
0
Total:
54
17
■
8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde
\ st & 2 nd ROTC Brigades
Syracuse University
University of Vermo
98TH DIV (IT)
ROCHESTER,
REGION A
Niagara Unive
Canisius Coll
University of Maine
St BonaventuiSiena Col
Seton H
UMass/Amherst
Northeastern University
Boston College
Rutgers Unive
University of Connecticut
Hofstra University
Saint John's
Fordham University
Hfl
• 8 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC Bde
st & 2nd roTC Brigades
Remarks
• Distance Learning
- Downloading
- Time Requirements
100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
Brigade
& 8th ROTC Brigade
Commander
COL Frank Argabright
Command Sergeant Major
CSM Otha Allen
100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
™ Brigade
7 th & 8th ROTC Brigade
. gTH/iooth Brigade
SROTC: Ft. Knox, KY.
Supports Cadet
Command ROTC
Detachments with 41
TPU soldiers throughout
the 7 th ROTC brigade.
University
Officers Enlisted
Assigned
Assigned
University of Kentucky
4
6
Eastern Kentucky University
4
3
Niddle Tennessee State Univ
5
1
University of Louisville
2
0
Western Kentucky University
2
1
UT Knoxville
1
0
Carson Newman College
1
0
Austin Peay State University
2
2
University of Memphis
0
1
University of North Alabama
1
1
J acksonville State University
3
1
Total:
25
16
United States Army
Cadet Command Headquarters
To commission the future officer
leadership of the US Army and motivate
young people to be better citizens
■
rc Jt 100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
™ Brigade
7 th & 8 th ROTC Brigade
8 th Brigade's APMS (A) Department - FY
TENNESSEE
MIDDLE TENN STATE
UNIV
CUMBERLAND UNIVERSITY
UNIVERSITY OF
TENNESSEE
UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS
CARSON NEWMAN
COLLEGE
AUSTIN PEAY STATE UN
KENTUCKY
UNIVERSITY OF
KENTUCKY
CENTRE COLLEGE
ASBURY COLLEGE
UNIVERSITY OF
LOUISVILLE
EASTERN KENTUCKY
UNVERSITY
CUMBERLAND COLLEGE
WESTERN KENTUCKY
UNIVERSITY
ALABAMA
JACKSONVILLE STATE
UNIVERSITY
GADSEN STATE COLLEGE
UNIV OF NORTH ALABAMA
■
nn 100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC «
Brigade fC7§l
7 th & 8th ROTC Brigade HxcellencI I
Uh Brigade's APMS (A) Department - FY 05
8 th Bde HO
Q - Host
© - Partnership
m
rc A 100 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
™ Brigade
7 th & 8th ROTC Brigade
Remarks
• Transition of 100 th Div (IT) & 84 th Div (IT)
• LTC Mission Support
• LDAC Mission Support (SAW)
^ 104 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
Brigade 13 th & 14 th ROTC Brigades
Commander
LTC Bruce Mulkey
Command Sergeant Major
CSM James Davis
Presenter: LTC Malcolm Lee
104 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
gade 13 th & 14 th ROTC Brigades
8 TH/io4th Brigade SROTC:
Ft Lewis, WA. (104 th Div at
Vancouver Barracks, WA)
Supports Cadet Command
ROTC Detachments with 36
TPU soldiers throughout
the 13 th & 14 th ROTC
Brigades.
United States Army
Cadet Command Headquarters
To commission the future officer
leadership of the US Army and motivate
young people to be better citizens
University
Officers Enlisted
Assianed
Assianed
UNLV (NV)
5
6
S.D. School of Mines &Technoloav
1
0
ARIZONA STATE (AZ)
2
0
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
1
0
BRIGHAM YOUNG (UT)
1
0
CLARK COLLEGE (WA)
1
1
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
1
0
PACIFIC LUTHERAN (WA)
4
0
PORTLAND STATE (OR)
1
0
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY (WA)
2
2
UCLA(CA)
2
0
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA (MT)
1
0
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO (CA)
0
1
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH (UT)
1
0
UTAH STATE (UT)
1
0
WEBER STATE (UT)
1
0
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
1
0
Total:
26
10
■
104 th
13 th &
DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
14 th ROTC Brigades
University of
Clark College
University of Montana
University
Pacific Lutheran
104TH DIV (IT
VANCOUVER, Wj
REGION
Portland State
Univ of S.E
Univ of Ca:
Cal State University
UNLV
UCLA
Weber State
S.D. School of
Mines
niversity of Utah
gham Young
izona State
104 th DIV(IT), 8 th SROTC
gade 13 th & 14 th ROTC Brigades
Remarks
• Pilot program started in '98 at Seattle
University was a success, resulting in Pacific
Lutheran University (satellite) to become
host program in 2001.
• Current program at UNLV (host: UNR) is a big
success for Cadet Command and USARC
• Support for 2004 Warrior Forge. Provide
soldier skills training in 5 training
committees. Supervise and support all USAR
in support of WF. Over 1,000 USAR
personnel supported.
108 th DIV(IT), 9 th SROTC
Brigade
4 th , 5 th & 6 th SROTC Brigades
Commander
COL Stuart M. Dyer
■
Command Sergeant Major
CSM Dennis A. Nance
4 th , 5 th
108 th DIV(IT) f 9 th SROTC
Brigade
& 6 th SROTC Brigades
. 9 TH/io8th Brigade
SROTC: Charlotte, NC.
Supports Cadet
Command ROTC
Detachments with 55
TPU soldiers throughout
the 4 th , 5 th & 6 th ROTC
Brigades.
United States Army
University
Officers Enlisted
Assigned
Assigned
North Carolina A & T Greensboro, NC
3
5
UNC -Charlotte, Charlotte, NC
7
1
USC-South Carolina, Columbia, SC
1
2
Benedict College, Columbia, SC
1
2
Morris College, Sumter, SC
1
1
University of Puerto Rio, Rio Piedras
4
3
University of Puerto Rio, Mayaguez
4
1
Presbyterian College, Clinton, SC
4
0
University of Central Florida, Orlando,
3
0
Valencia Comm College, Orlando, FL
2
0
Sem Community College, Orlando, FL
1
0
Georgia Inst of Technology Atlanta, G
3
1
Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA
2
0
Kennesaw State University, Kennesa\
2
1
Total:
38
17
To commission the future officer
leadership of the US Army and motivate
young people to be better citizens
■
♦UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO
AT MAYAGUEZ
lUo tn DIV(IT) f 9 tn SROTC
Brigade
4 th , 5 th , 6 th & 8 th SROTC
Brigades
Remarks
• Improved communications/multiple
touch points
Working Group #1 - Issue #1
• Issue : Identify potential Soldiers who are able to go
on 179-day TTAD/ADSW tour IAW provisions outlined
at:
http://www.rotc.monroe.army.mil/command/reserve_request.html
• Discussion : Since no TDY funds are available for this
program, it must be a local program utilizing soldiers
available in the vicinity of each requesting university. Funding
for these tours to be drawn from USACC funds.
• Recommendation : Universities needing this support
should first seek approval from their AC brigade. The AC
brigade validates the requirement and ensures funds are
available. Once the requirement is validated, the AC brigade
contacts the supporting RC SROTC brigade, which then
advertises the specific requirement to all RC soldiers in the
university area. SROTC Bdes may keep a standing list of
Working Group #1 - Issue #2
* Issue : Should we fund recently commissioned
Reserve LTs to go on tour up to 179-days in support of
USACC's LDAC/LTC/JROTC summer training courses.
Who pays?
* Discussion : Reserve LTs often have to wait up to
180+ days before they can attend OBC. If they are
brought on active duty immediately post-
commissioning, can USACC provide meaningful work
for them at LDACC or otherwise - work that both
benefits the soldier and the Army? USARC has no
funds for this.
* Recommendation : Reserve LTs would be better used
as Gold Bar Recruiters. USAR and USARNG may be
interested in funding Gold Bar Recruiters who will be
oriented on recruiting potential Reserve / Guard-bound
cadets. USACC may wish to consider funding slots for
Working Group #1 - Issue #3
* Issue : Review USACC's Reserve Partnership Way Ahead,
and comment on DIV(IT)/USACC partnership opportunities,
such as dedicated Ranger Challenge event support, FTX
support, & etc.
* Discussion: Way Ahead does not address utilization of
TPU support and coordination required to optimize this
cooperative effort.
* Recommendation :
- Formalize TPU augmentation via MOU
- Determine magnitude of support requirements
(establishes footprint of desired TPU support)
- Include 8 th Bde reps at USACC Bde training
conferences
- USACC identify types of dedicated support required I
for LDAC (enables 8 th Bdes to determine feasibility of
Working Group #1 - Issue #4
* Issue : There is no Memorandum of Understanding
between USACC and USARC
* Discussion: This lack is presenting difficulties to our
soldiers in the utilization of soldiers by PMSs.
* Recommendation : Cadet Command and USARC
should jointly develop a Memorandum of Understanding
regarding utilization of TPU soldiers. The MoU should
cover:
• Duties of TPU Instructors
• Rating Scheme OER/NCOER
• COMTEK/TPU status policy
• Instructor Qualifications
• Process for annual review of schools using or needing TPU support
* Action Agency: (USACC. COL Harrell, ph/fax/email) _
Working Group #1 - Issue #5
■ Issue : Mobilization Mission
■ Discussion: SROTC brigades do not have a unit
mobilization mission, other than furnishing individual
replacements, as needed.
■ Recommendation : USARC and USACC should jointly
examine the mobilization mission of 8 th brigades.
* Recommend that the 8 th Bde be given a mobilization
mission similar to the mission performed by TASS
brigades and Drill Sergeant brigades, and given the
mission of assuming responsibility for host school
cadre.
* This may require derivative UlCs for each school
■
Action Agency: (USACC. COL Harrell, ph/fax/email)
Working Group #1 - Issue #6
* Issue : Metrics
* Discussion: There currently is no method of measuring
the effectiveness of utilizing TPU soldiers as SROTC
instructors.
* Recommendation : Develop standard measurements
based on recruiting, enrollment, retention, commissioning,
LDAC scoring.
* Compare performance of schools with TPU
augmentation vs schools without TPU augmentation.
* Compare performance of schools with TPU
augmentation vs the performance of the school prior to
TPU augmentation.
* Action Agency: (Organization. Officer, ph/fax/email)
wa
Working Group #2
Training & Training Support
for
LDAC, LTC, JROTC & CTLT
Working Group Two
USAR Support to:
• LTC
• Ranger Challenge
• LDAC
• CTLT
• JROTC
USAR Support 2004
Leadership Training Course
USAR Soldiers and Officers
Personnel Spaces to support
184 LTC at Fort Knox KY
17 Average Tour Length
days
USAR Support 2004
Leadership Training Course
USAR Committee Responsibility:
- FLRC
- 9MM Range
- Map Reading / Land Navigation
- Holding Company
USAR Support 2004
Leadership Training Course
6 Companies 2004 with Projected 7 Companies
2005
- (TRADOC) Projected of 7 would decrement BCT
starts at Fort Knox
- (USAR) Projected of 7 would not increase spaces
but time frame would increase faces
USARC Annual Training Planning Conference -
August 04
USAR Support 2004
Ranger Challenge/FTX's
Competing Resources
• Decentralized and varied throughout Cadet
Command
• Constrained Resources v. past OPTEMPO
• Increased requirements to USAR Soldiers
• Timing Challenge with FY Budgeting
Resolution: Formal mission request in order to
adequately plan and provide resources
USAR Support 2004
dership Development and Assessment Cours
USAR Soldiers and Officers will
support LDAC at Fort Lewis WA
Personnel High Watermark -
July
Personnel Spaces
USAR Support 2004
adership Development and Assessment Cour
28
$? rM
August
First Soldier on the Ground
Last Soldier Departs
17
d ir
days
Average Tour Length
Longest Tour Length
USAR Major Supporting Units
94 th DIV
100 th DIV
63 rd RRC
80 th RRC
88 th RRC
96 th RRC
95 th DIV
104 th DIV
70 th RRC
81 st RRC
89 th RRC
99 th RRC
98 th DIV
108 th DIV
77 th RRC
84 th RRC
90 th RRC
2 x CRCs
■
Including approximately 15 TTAD
personnel
LDAC Major Activities Supported
Automatic Weapons Range
Individual Tactical Training
Hand Grenade Range
Basic Rifle Marksmanship
Nuclear Biological and Chemical
Training
CommittSup^|Qillt5a)ndeTlTat%Sf)l(MTMaonnits 2-3
summer is a rotation year
LDAC Future Support
ITT, HG, BRSM, and AW Committees
Spaces v. faces based on time and
cadets
- 14 Regiments (5200/4800)
- Largest 348
- Smallest 271
LDAC Future Support
August - September examination of
support and regiments
Close working relationship with 104 th
DIV
Tie in with installation support
USAR Supported CTLT
-2004 USAR Support CTLT
Cadet Command CTLT 586 Slots
Total with internships 840 Slots
USAR Pilot Program Slots 12 (6)
2005 CTLT Goal of 1000-1500
USAR Supported CTLT
"Win - Win" Situation
Marketing tool for the USAR
Educational along the One Army model
Availability of additional slots
Challenge = timing of CTLT with unit training
Past Support
USAR Support to JROTC
• Decentralized and varied throughout Cadet Command
• Constrained Resource v. past OPTEMPO
• Increased requirements to USAR Soldier
Developing Raider Challenge for 2005
- 35-40 USAR Soldiers
Drill Championships March 2005
- 2 days 25 USAR Soldiers ea. Region
Cadet Leadership Challenge 121 "Camps"
Working Group #3
Problem Statement
The Army Reserve lacks an effective
training strategy to ensure all Direct
Commission candidates achieve pre-
commissioning competencies
Working Group #3 - Issue # 1
* Issue: How should USARC implement and task-organize
centralized C2 for the Officer Development Course (ODC)
• Discussion : At present, the pilot is in its 2 nd generation;
USACC will not provide expanded ARG2G support until the
Reserve task-organizes central C2 and ownership of the
initiative, and enforces BOLC-I calibrated standards in
training.
* Recommendation : The USARC G7 has recommended
that the current ARG2G program conducted by the DIVs
(IT) be terminated. State and federal OCS, ROTC and
direct commission capabilities need to be utilized to
address LT shortages in the Army Reserve. The 84 th
ARRTC can work with USACC to develop a functional
training course (ODC) for direct commissionees to ensure
that pre-commissioning competencies are achieved.
Artinn Ananrw ■ /Q/lth A D DT C' I oarlor nQ\/QlnnmQnf
Working Group #3 - Issue # 2
£xcellenc£
* Issue: What BOLC I knowledges, skills, abilities
(KSA) must be achieved? How will the Army Reserve
assess prospective candidates and ensure KSAs are
met at time of commissioning?
* Discussion: All commissionees must possess a solid
baseline of USAAC approved BOLC l/pre-commissioning
competencies
* Recommendation : 84 th ARRTC participate in the
USAAC 4GOLD Committee to ensure standardization.
The Army Reserve develop a training strategy based
on TRADOC's systems approach to training (SAT)
beginning with a needs analysis of the target
population.
* Action Agency: (84 th ARRTC, Leader Development M
Directorate, (608) 388-7113)
Working Group #3 - Issue # 3
* Issue: What should the training strategy look like?
* Discussion : A DS or NCO of the year possesses a
different skill set than a recently degreed PFC or CPL.
Different tracks for different skill sets may need to be
developed.
* Recommendation : The needs analysis will identify
the best training options based on Soldier
competencies and organizational structure.
* Action Agency: (84th ARRTC, Leader Development
Directorate, (608) 388-7113)
Preliminary
Tracks and Timeline
01
Q2
Q3
Sep
Inprocessing
1. APFT
2. Admin
3. Standards
4. Board Prep
5. Verify Locs
6. Counseling
3oard
Weekend
Saturday
Test Day
APFT
Land Nav
BRM
Swim Test
5. 22-5 Demo
Sunday
Board
1. Class A inspect
2. Interview
3. Board Decision
4. Assign Tracks
5. Counsel Standards
Officer Developmep
(DL/ADT) Msn: 25-75 ► |
Highly selective;
designed for DS/NCO of
the year; train on
ethics, ethos, creed,
Federal OCS
(14 wks ADT)
Msn: 120
values & staff ride
Colurse
State OCS
(ADT/IDT/ADT)
Msn: 100-200
Imperatives
• Centralize Direct commissioning Training Effort; requires Reserve-wide ownership and authority for viability.
Recommend ARRTC's DOLD.
• Mission the Reserve's C2 Matrix and HRC-St. Louis to provide candidates for both OCS and Direct
Commissioning. G-l missions the RRCs and commanders answer to the CAR with annually reviewed results.
• Incentivize candidates with the right stuff to take the time out to become an officer by insuring they retain
current enlistment/re-enlistment bonuses.
• Market the Scholar, Athlete, Leader
• Resource the Cadre from the Army Reserve SROTC Bdes to execute the training
Working Group #3 - Issue # 4
* Issue: How will the Army Reserve G-l determine
missioning requirements and enforce those production
goals? How can the senior leadership help? How should
the direct commission program be marketed?
* Discussion: HRC-St. Louis stipulates it can/should
identify all degreed Soldiers throughout the Army
Reserve with the S-A-L prerequisites for direct
commissioning. At issue is how can direct commissioning
be marketed and promoted within the Army Reserve to
attain the CAR's objective to direct-commission upwards
of 600 officers per year?
* Recommendation : Utilize the Retention Transition
Division (RTD) assets within the RRCs. RTD has the
capability to identify and assign mission distribution and
use officer commissioning as an incentive to retain
qualified applicants.
Potential Mission Changes
or all Commissioning Sources
BLUF * Ramp up OCS to 250 immediately, then throttle down after FY09
• Ramp up ROTC to 1100 during FY07-FY09 & maintain as pri. comm.
• Ramp up Dir. Comm, to 550 during FY05-FY09, then throttle down
* Use ARG2G to put officership in the direct commission strategy
Fed OCS
FY04 FYQ5 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Remarks
120
120
120
120
120
120
Additional OCS
130
130
130
130
130
Implement immediate
i OCS mission
of 250
ROTC
670
670
650
650
650
650
Nurses
n/a
n/a
25
50
75
100
Additional ROTC
n/a
n/a
n/a
150
250
350
Total ROTC mission ramps up Id 1100 byFY09
AR Dir. Comm
200
200
200
200
200
200
AMEDD Dir. Comm.
50
50
50
50
50
Normal medical offcer access ions rate
Genuine Dir. Comm.
50
50
50
50
50
Genuine, highlyqualiffed Dir. Comm. Soldiers
Program Dir. Comm.
100
100
100
100
100
Training program using Ft McCoy
Increase Dir Comm
100
275
300
325
350
Training program using Ft McCoy
Currently Missioned
Delta
990
990
230
995
405
1020
580
1045
1070
6110
Total Commissions w/o Change
705
830
2750
Total Additional Commissions
source
Implement
Centralize
Standardize
Webify
Incentivize
Mission
Select
Train
Certify
Commission
Revised Missions FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09
Federal OCS
250
250
250
250
250
NG State OCS
150
150
150
150
150
ROTC
670
675
750
825
900
Working Group #3 - Issue # 5
I jXCELLENC^
• Issue: How will the Army Reserve fund the incentives to
promote market interest; how will those $$ be distributed?
When should candidates be paid (upon commissioning or in
phased amounts)?
• Discussion : Need to know what un-programmed or
existing $$ can be leveraged for FY05 Direct Commissioning
objectives and beyond. ROTC uses $7500 stipend and
scholarships. What's the right amount for the Army Reserve,
and how rapidly can this amount be utilized?
• Recommendation : Recommend change to current policies
to allow the CAR to waive the recoupment of enlistment/re-
enlistment bonuses. NDAA FY 04 authorizes incentives for
officer accessions. The Army Reserve is requesting
clarification thru DA G1 on applicability to TPU Soldiers.
Action Agency: (USARC. Gl, (404) 464-XXXX)
Working Group #3 - Issue # 6
* Issue: Where should the Training Cells be located?
How many should be staffed to attain a 500-LT annual
mission? How will the SROTC Bdes/DIV(IT)s task
organize IAW geographic boundaries of the 14 ROTC
Bdes? Should the training cells be OPCON, attached, or
assigned to the 84 th ARRTC leadership? How should
their cadre be resourced?
* Discussion: SROTC Bdes are aligned within DIV (IT)
boundaries. Location of Training Cells will vary and is
not necessarily critical to the execution.
* Recommendation : The needs analysis needs to look
at demographics to determine Training Cell
allocations. ARFP will redistribute FTS and TPU assets
to support. A proposal to align the Army Reserve
SROTC Bdes under the 84 th ARRTC is being considered.
Arf Ananriri (Q/lfh A D DTP I o^rlor nQ\/Qlnnmnnf
Working Group #3 - Issue # 7
* Issue: How should awarding of direct commissions be
controlled, such that those candidates who do not meet the
standard, or who demonstrate consistent mediocrity, are culled
from the program? Who has disenrollment authority? How can
direct-commission packets be held in abeyance at HRC-St. Louis
and then 'greenlighted' for commission letters to be posted
once training benchmarks have been attained?
• Discussion : USACC readily disenrolls those cadets who
display a lack of physical/mental hardiness,
reliability/accountability, and a strong commitment to an ethical
standard. The Army Reserve must not fail to exercise quality
hygiene measures by disenrolling those who are
physically/mentally/ethically substandard or mediocre at best.
HRC-St. Louis continue to pre-screen applicants and board
process.
• Recommendation : Establish centralized business rules for
national standardization. Decentralize the execution of the
selection and training process to the RRCs.
Working Group #3 - Issue # 8
£xcellenc£
* Issue: How should boards be administered? What is
the right composition of officers and NCOS on the
board?
* Discussion: HRC-St. Louis currently conducts
boards quarterly to appoint candidates nominated by
the RRCs. HRC-St. Louis establishes board schedules
and policies and RRCs execute policies.
* Recommendation : Establish RRC board policies and
standards to ensure consistency across the Army
Reserve. Focused on training potential as well as
eligibility standards.
Action Aaencv: (USARC. G1 ICW HRC-St. Louis)
Concluding Remarks
And
Discussion
■
Backup Slides
Workshop Instructions and
Operating Procedure
* Discussion (Group Leader note timeline and adhere; put
egos on hold; move discussion along)
* Task Organize (break up into sub-groups to nail down
the due-outs NLT COB Tues)
* Start off early AM Thurs & maintain strong work tempo
* Record draft due-outs on CDRW
* Brief IPR to COL Harrell at 1130, Wed
* Develop due-outs and brief MG Thrasher 1600, Wed
* Coordinate with other working groups for related issues
and deconflict conflicting resourcing goals
* Brief IPR to COL Harrell at 1130, Friday
* Finalize due-outs, & prep for DCG Brief to BG Sealock
* Summit close-out brief to DCG, BG Sealock at 1500,
Fridav